Let me tell you a story about something I shared with some people a couple of years ago...
I had been speaking at a seminar when after it was done a group of us decided to go to dinner together (it was at a "fondue" restaurant... both Bob Silber and I are still starving from that experience!)... during the dinner a conversation started about projects some of us were working on and how we'd promote it and get the word out...
We got around to talking about joint-ventures and endorsements... I explained how I was going to use the endorsements of some "names" I knew in order to get a certain project off the ground and running (this was before the HUGE launches we see today)... I laid out my plan and how it would work...
One of the others at the table stated that my plan was all well and good but since I have a bit of notoriety and connections on the net that it would be easy for me to set up the endorsement/JV opportunities, and that they, because they were "small fish" in a big pond, wouldn't be able to do the same...
I begged to differ...
I asked this person two questions...
1) If I could show them how to have as many JV/endorsement set-ups as they'd like would that interest them?... of course they said yes...
2) If I told them that the majority of their JV's were going to be people with small lists would it be something they'd be interested in pursuing?... they paused for a moment, looked at me and said... NO!
That's the answer I expected... but then I proceeded to share WHY this type of JV could be very beneficial to them...
You see... there are more people that are "everymen" on the net with small lists (but often responsive) than there are the "big names"... and those "everymen" are often looking for the same thing you are, to promote their products or products they can promote to their list that can make them some money...
These "everymen" are being sold to by the "names" but are rarely being approached to be JV, endorsement or launch partners... they are seen as too "small potato's" to be really bothered with outside of having them as affiliates (which makes them commissioned sales reps rather than partners/endorsers)... you can't really blame the "names"... it's a matter of economics and scale... they get a bigger payday with "bigger" names with proven, larger lists than with tons of smaller "everymen" with small lists that limit their sales...
But for other "everymen" looking to find partners/endorsers and building a track record of successful JV's (and learning how JV's really work), the smaller "fish" are a perfect solution and a group dying, really dying, to be tapped...
Okay... reality is that someone with 500 or 1000 or 2000 names on a list does not have a huge market share... they may only sell a handful of your items... but... while the promotions may take a little work on your end (and if you structure things right this could be minimal as you could develop plug-n-play JV promotions ready to go for partners), and while it may only sell a few products there are some plusses here:
1) You've sold a few more products today (thus earning a few more dollars today), than yesterday -- every penny helps...
2) You've been endorsed and exposed to a the list of a marketer at no real cost to you... this marketer has endorsed your product with their name and reputation (and make sure they have a good reputation) and placed you in good light with their list no matter how small or large it is...
3) Depending on how well the promotion turns out you may have found someone who you can approach over and over again when you have other products to sell and other partnerships to offer (it's amazing how many small lists are actually quite responsive... I know of one marketer who has a list of only 285 people which buy almost every product he promotes to them, he literally makes thousands of dollars a month from that small, very responsive and quite loyal list)...
4) As described above, often there's more loyalty in a smaller list... marketers with smaller lists need to build loyalty with their members because it's important to them... every name/addy on their list is a potential customer/buyer... this means potential profit... and they can't afford (unless they aren't serious) to lose them or offend them... a 10% subscriber loss for a "big name" is nothing, it's a small pin prick... but a 10% loss for an "everyman" marketer hurts... it's hard work when you're an "everyman" to build a list... every name counts and you want to guard, protect, nurture and build loyalty in that list... your virtual business survival is often at stake on your list...
I explained to this person that I would take smaller "everyman" partners anytime... that more often than not it was a win-win situation for both of us and could/would help us build our sales, business and track record... not everyone is going to become a "big name" and less will even get to play with them (outside of paying them big bucks for advice, info, products or to bask in their glow at seminars)... plus, you can always parlay these smaller JV's/endorsements into a network of partners that work together to help each other build their businesses and product success (mini-JV/mastermind networks)...
After I explained my thoughts they understood... and while they still worked towards getting the "big names" interested in what they had to offer (which they eventually did to some extent and have done well with what they've produced) they no longer discounted the smaller "everyman" marketer... there's a lot more of them than the "biggies"... they're often hungrier, more eager and more willing to be approached and work together with you...
"One Fish... Two Fish... Red Fish... Blue Fish..."... penny by penny, quarter by quarter you build a business, successes, profits and wealth... don't discount the lowly penny (or the "everyman"), someday you may just need it!
Success!!!

Tony Blake
Marketing Mindreader™
New Media/Content2.0™ Maven
Õ¿Õ¬